1,700-Employee Firm Sees 8% ESOP Candidate Surge Amid Talent War
Ulteig’s new CHRO Sara Chapman reveals how the firm’s ESOP is driving recruitment wins and a collaborative culture amid an engineering talent shortage. With 6,500+ ESOPs nationally and an 8% decade-long participant increase, employee ownership is becoming a strategic HR lever, but Chapman warns it’s no cure-all without deliberate culture-building.
Key Takeaways
- Ulteig’s new CHRO Sara Chapman reveals how the firm’s ESOP is driving recruitment wins and a collaborative culture amid an engineering talent shortage.
- With 6,500+ ESOPs nationally and an 8% decade-long participant increase, employee ownership is becoming a strategic HR lever, but Chapman warns it’s no cure-all without deliberate culture-building.
Mentioned
Key Intelligence
Key Facts
- 1Ulteig promotes Sara Chapman to CHRO in spring 2026 after two years as director of HR.
- 2The firm employs 1,700 across North America and Costa Rica and operates an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).
- 3U.S. had more than 6,500 registered ESOPs in 2023, with ESOP participants growing about 8% over the past decade.
- 4The SECURE Act 2.0 (2022) created an Employee Ownership Initiative to promote ESOP adoption.
- 5Candidates frequently ask about the ESOP during recruiting, giving Ulteig an edge in an engineering talent shortage.
- 6Chapman emphasizes that ESOPs lay a foundation but do not guarantee sustainable culture without ongoing effort.
I didn’t realize how much the ESOP model would play a factor, even in recruiting, where more candidates than I realized ask a lot about the ESOP. They’re interested in joining an organization where your voice matters and you have a stake in the outcomes.
Reflecting on candidate interactions during a tight labor market
U.S. Department of Labor, 2023 data
Analysis
For HR leaders grappling with engineering talent shortages, Ulteig’s experience offers a compelling case for employee stock ownership as a recruitment and retention accelerator. The firm’s ESOP is now a top candidate inquiry point, moving the conversation beyond salary to long-term wealth and organizational voice. This shift demands that HR departments not just administer benefits but actively shape an ownership culture that turns every employee into a stakeholder.
Ulteig, an infrastructure engineering services firm with 1,700 employees across North America and Costa Rica, has placed its employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) at the heart of a people-centric culture strategy. This spring, the company promoted Sara Chapman to chief human resources officer, tasking her with deepening that culture as the organization grows. Chapman’s appointment signals a deliberate effort to align HR leadership with the company’s ownership model, which has evolved from a mere retirement benefit into a recruiting differentiator and cultural glue amid a severe engineering talent shortage. Her early insights reveal how employee ownership can transform workforce dynamics—but also where its limits lie.
Ulteig, an infrastructure engineering services firm with 1,700 employees across North America and Costa Rica, has placed its employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) at the heart of a people-centric culture strategy.
ESOPs have gained traction across the U.S.: the Department of Labor reports more than 6,500 registered plans as of 2023, with participant numbers rising about 8% over the previous decade. Legislative tailwinds, notably the SECURE Act 2.0 of 2022 and its Employee Ownership Initiative, aim to accelerate adoption by educating employers on the potential of broad-based ownership. At Ulteig, the ESOP has tangible effects. Chapman notes that candidates in a hyper-competitive labor market frequently ask detailed questions about the plan, far more than she anticipated. This interest gives Ulteig a leg up, converting ownership from a back-office financial arrangement into a compelling attraction tool. The cultural impact is equally profound. Because employees directly share in the company’s financial success, they feel a greater sense of agency and partnership; Chapman describes a “we’re in this together” mindset that encourages open dialogue and feedback. This ownership mentality aligns individual incentives with long-term organizational health, potentially reducing turnover and boosting engagement—critical metrics for any HR leader.
However, Chapman cautions that an ESOP alone does not guarantee a sustainable culture. She acknowledges that the stock plan provides a “wonderful foundation” but emphasizes that culture must be actively nurtured through leadership behaviors, communication, and processes that reinforce the principle that every voice matters. The risk is that an ESOP can be perceived as a passive entitlement, while its true value emerges only when employees understand the connection between their daily work and the company’s valuation. This requires ongoing education, transparency, and opportunities for genuine input—areas where HR must play a central role.
What to Watch
From a market perspective, Ulteig’s experience intersects with broader trends: the engineering workforce gap is projected to widen, making innovative retention and recruitment strategies essential. ESOPs offer a structured way to share wealth and create emotional ownership, but they also come with compliance complexities and fiduciary responsibilities. The SECURE Act 2.0’s support could increase ESOP formations, especially in industries where specialized talent is scarce. Yet, as Chapman’s story illustrates, the true differentiator lies in how the plan is woven into daily operations rather than remaining a standalone benefit.
Looking ahead, the HR function at ESOP companies must evolve beyond traditional administrative roles to become stewards of ownership culture. This includes measuring the impact of employee ownership on engagement, productivity, and retention—metrics that remain under-tapped in many ESOP firms. Ulteig’s approach, with a CHRO explicitly tasked with aligning HR and business strategy through the lens of ownership, could serve as a blueprint for other firms considering or already operating under an ESOP. As policy support grows and talent competition intensifies, the intersection of employee ownership and people-centric leadership will likely become a defining HR strategy for knowledge-intensive sectors.
Sources
Sources
Based on 2 source articles- HR ExecutiveHow ESOP models bring Ulteig’s ‘people-centric’ culture to lifeJul 14, 2026
- HR ExecutiveHow ESOP models bring Ultieg’s ‘people-centric’ culture to lifeJul 14, 2026
Cite This Page
"1,700-Employee Firm Sees 8% ESOP Candidate Surge Amid Talent War." HR & Workforce Intelligence Brief, July 15, 2026. https://gethrbrief.com/story/ulteig-esop-culture-chro-recruiting-edge
How we covered this story
Every story in our hr & workforce coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.
Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the hr & workforce space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.
Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.
| Signal on this page | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Verified by N sources | Independent corroboration count. N≥2 is our confidence floor; N=1 is marked explicitly. |
| Impact score (1-10) | Regulatory + financial + operational weight. 8+ signals an experienced-operator action item. |
| Sentiment | Five-tier classification trained on labeled hr & workforce-specific corpora. |
| Timeline | Where applicable, the related-events sequence that contextualizes today's development. |