market-trends Bearish 6

Retirement Shortfall Hits Workforce: 41 States Face $109K Gap per Employee

· 4 min read · Verified by 7 sources ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • A CareScout Analytics study finds workers in 41 states and D.C.
  • will run out of retirement money, with an average $109,000 gap.
  • For HR leaders, this signals a wave of delayed retirements, squeezed talent pipelines, and rising demand for financial wellness benefits—making retirement readiness a urgent workforce planning issue.

Mentioned

CareScout Analytics research firm Federal Reserve government agency California state New York state Washington state New Hampshire state Colorado state Nebraska state Idaho state Minnesota state Utah state Maryland state Montana state

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1CareScout Analytics projects the average 65-year-old retiree will face a $109,000 shortfall between lifetime spending and expected retirement income.
  2. 2Retirees in 41 states and Washington D.C. are expected to outlive their retirement savings; only nine states—Washington, New Hampshire, Colorado, Nebraska, Idaho, Minnesota, Utah, Maryland, and Montana—show a surplus.
  3. 3High cost-of-living states such as California and New York are flagged where seniors outlive savings, driven by long-term care expenses.
  4. 4The Federal Reserve reports 8% of non-retired adults have already tapped into their retirement savings to cover other costs, compounding future deficits.
  5. 5CareScout recommends evaluating long-term care costs by state before relocating, securing long-term care insurance during peak earning years, and consulting experts.
  6. 6Increased life expectancy is a primary driver: longer retirements demand significantly more assets, a shift that traditional savings models have not fully absorbed.
Average Retirement Savings Gap
$109,000

For 65-year-old retirees in 41 states and D.C., the expected shortfall between spending and retirement income

Who's Affected

Employees (55+)
groupNegative
HR/Benefits Teams
departmentNegative
Employers
organizationNegative
Financial Wellness Providers
industryPositive

Analysis

Human resources teams are on the front lines of a silent crisis: nearly every state in America faces a situation where employees reaching 65 will run out of retirement money—a projected $109,000 shortfall according to a new CareScout Analytics study. As the workforce ages and lifespans lengthen, financially unprepared employees may stay on the job longer, blocking career paths for younger workers and driving up employer-sponsored benefit costs. Forward-thinking HR departments can no longer ignore retirement planning as a core component of employee financial wellness.

A sweeping new study by CareScout Analytics reveals that the average 65-year-old American retiree will burn through their retirement savings and income with $109,000 left unpaid—a gap that spans 41 states and the District of Columbia. The projection compares expected lifetime spending against what Social Security, pensions, and nest eggs can realistically deliver, and it lands at a moment when the oldest Baby Boomers are already deep into their 80s and Gen X approaches retirement with record levels of anxiety. Only nine states—Washington, New Hampshire, Colorado, Nebraska, Idaho, Minnesota, Utah, Maryland, and Montana—are expected to generate a surplus for retirees, while high-cost anchors like California and New York lead the list of shortfall states. Two converging forces drive the numbers: rising longevity, which stretches retirement years beyond what savings plans were built for, and the rapidly accelerating cost of long-term care, whether delivered in a nursing home, assisted living facility, or at home. The study is as much a geography lesson as a financial one, underscoring that where one retires can be the single largest lever in closing the gap.

Only nine states—Washington, New Hampshire, Colorado, Nebraska, Idaho, Minnesota, Utah, Maryland, and Montana—are expected to generate a surplus for retirees, while high-cost anchors like California and New York lead the list of shortfall states.

The implications cascade beyond individual retirement accounts. When 8% of non-retired adults have already dipped into their retirement savings early, according to Federal Reserve data cited in the study, the shortfall is not just a future problem—it is a present drain on the financial system. Smaller balances today compound into larger deficits later, and the $109,000 figure represents the average; in high-cost metros the shortfall can easily double. CareScout’s recommendations—researching care costs before relocating, treating long-term care like a tax consideration in location decisions, and securing long-term care insurance during peak earning years—offer a practical playbook, but they also highlight a systemic failure: retirement planning remains an individual burden despite the enormity of the collective risk.

What to Watch

The geographic split creates a two-tiered retirement nation. The nine surplus states share some common traits: relatively lower housing costs, manageable long-term care expenses, and, critically, retirement savings cultures that have not been hollowed out by high-cost urban living. Yet even in these states, the cushion is thin. Montana’s surplus, for example, depends on land-rich but cash-poor households, while Washington’s high wages may not offset Seattle’s escalating care costs for everyone. The study forces a reckoning: moving to a low-cost state is not a panacea if the cost of in-home care or a nursing home shifts as well. CareScout’s data suggests that assisted living and nursing home costs vary dramatically, and the source of that variation—state regulatory environments, labor markets, and Medicaid reimbursement rates—is beyond any single retiree’s control.

Looking ahead, the retirement savings gap will reshape industries and policy debates. For employers, an aging workforce that cannot afford to retire blocks career progression, raises benefit costs, and dampens productivity. For policymakers, the shortfall adds pressure to shore up Social Security and explore public long-term care insurance options. The private sector’s response—long-term care insurance products, hybrid annuities, and robo-advisors—is still in its infancy, and penetration rates remain low. The study also hints at a behavioral finance dimension: 65-year-olds today are not a monolithic group, and the gap is likely wider for women, people of color, and those without access to employer-sponsored plans. Without intervention, the $109,000 average shortfall will morph from a projection into a lived reality for millions, making location-based retirement strategies one of the few tools within immediate reach.

Sources

Sources

Based on 7 source articles

How we covered this story

Every story in our hr & workforce coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the hr & workforce space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.