62% of NC employers struggle to hire—policy brief backs college workforce ties
A new Martin Center brief urges tying North Carolina college funding to employment outcomes, directly addressing the 62% of employers who can't find qualified workers. Apprenticeship completers show 13 percentage point employment gains, signaling a talent pipeline fix.
Beat this week
Last 7 days · Talent
Impact 5.2/10 (+0.1 vs prior). Counts are stories in our record, not a market forecast.
Open the change reportCoverage balance Negative coverage leads. Negative coverage exceeds positive coverage by 16 percentage points.
This story sits in Talent — the counts compare this beat's last 7 days with the previous 7 in our verified record, not a market forecast.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record (as of ) The volume change compares this window with the prior 7 days in the same record. — see our methodology for how impact and sentiment are derived.
HR & Workforce briefing
Key takeaways
- A new Martin Center brief urges tying North Carolina college funding to employment outcomes, directly addressing the 62% of employers who can't find qualified workers.
- Apprenticeship completers show 13 percentage point employment gains, signaling a talent pipeline fix.
In this briefing
Mentioned
Key Intelligence
Key Facts
- 162% of North Carolina employers reported difficulty finding qualified workers in the 2024 Employer Needs Survey, down from 81% in 2021.
- 2Students who complete at least one internship are 49% less likely to be underemployed after earning a degree (Burning Glass Institute & Strada Institute, Feb 2024).
- 3Apprenticeship completers in NC are 13 percentage points more likely to be employed and earn higher wages a decade after finishing their programs (NC Commerce Dept., April 2026).
- 4The UNC System identifies shortages in business, computer science, education, engineering, and the health professions as fields producing too few graduates.
- 5The Carolina Battery Institute, founded in 2023 by Soelect Inc., runs a hands-on training program for lithium-ion battery manufacturing as a model employer-led initiative.
Down from 81% in 2021, but still above pre-pandemic levels, reflecting persistent talent shortages
North Carolina is lucky to have a growing, vibrant economy. We need workforce policies that can keep up with it.
In a statement accompanying the policy brief's release
Analysis
For HR leaders grappling with North Carolina's 62% employer difficulty rate in finding qualified workers, the Martin Center's call to tie college funding to workforce outcomes isn't just an education policy—it's a direct talent strategy. By pushing for employer co-designed curricula and expanded apprenticeships, the brief offers a framework to close the skills gap that has bedeviled recruitment and retention.
The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal released a policy brief this week urging North Carolina to overhaul how it funds public colleges by tying appropriations directly to employment outcomes and requiring employer partnerships in curriculum design. The brief, authored by president Jenna A. Robinson, argues that labor shortages, accelerating technological change, and demographic shifts have created a persistent mismatch between the graduates the state's higher education system produces and the workforce demands of its growing economy. With 62% of North Carolina employers reporting difficulty finding qualified workers in 2024 — down from 81% in 2021 but still historically elevated — the pressure to realign postsecondary training with labor market needs has become acute.
With 62% of North Carolina employers reporting difficulty finding qualified workers in 2024 — down from 81% in 2021 but still historically elevated — the pressure to realign postsecondary training with labor market needs has become acute.
The proposal represents a significant departure from the traditional enrollment-driven funding model for public universities and community colleges. Instead of rewarding institutions solely for student headcount, the Martin Center's framework would make sustained state support contingent on measurable employment results, including post-graduation earnings, placement rates in high-demand fields, and long-term career progression. This outcomes-based funding concept has gained traction in other states like Texas and Florida, but the North Carolina brief adds a crucial component: formalized partnerships where employers actively shape academic programs, identify skill requirements, and provide work-based learning opportunities.
Robinson's brief marshalls compelling data to support its case. A February 2024 analysis from the Burning Glass Institute and Strada Institute for the Future of Work found that students who complete at least one internship are 49% less likely to be underemployed after earning a degree. Meanwhile, North Carolina's own Department of Commerce reported in April that apprenticeship completers had a 13 percentage point higher employment rate and significantly higher wages a decade after finishing their programs, demonstrating the durable value of integrating work experience into education. The UNC System itself identifies critical shortages in business, computer science, education, engineering, and health professions — confirming that even within the existing structure, graduate production is misaligned with employer demand.
Already, North Carolina has demonstrated homegrown models that embody the brief's principles. The Carolina Battery Institute, launched in 2023 by Greensboro-based battery manufacturer Soelect Inc., operates what it claims is the nation's first hands-on training program for lithium-ion battery manufacturing. By directly connecting training with an emerging industry cluster, the institute has become a proof point for how employer-led education can fill specific talent gaps. The brief positions such initiatives not as outliers but as templates that should be scaled statewide through policy incentives.
What to Watch
The implications for North Carolina's higher education landscape are far-reaching. For colleges and universities, a shift to outcomes-based funding would require building robust career services infrastructure, tracking alumni employment patterns, and forging deep relationships with local employers — capabilities many institutions currently lack. For students, the emphasis on internships and apprenticeships promises clearer pathways from degree programs to gainful employment, potentially reducing the underemployment that plagues many graduates. For businesses, the policy could unlock a more predictable talent pipeline, easing the persistent hiring difficulties that have constrained growth across sectors from manufacturing to technology.
Looking ahead, the Martin Center brief enters a policy environment where workforce development has become a bipartisan priority. The presence of existing employer partnerships and supportive state data creates momentum, but the proposal faces significant political headwinds from institutions that rely on enrollment-based funding formulas and from faculty groups concerned about diluting academic freedom. The brief's timing — amid tight labor markets and growing skepticism about the ROI of traditional degrees — may amplify its influence in the upcoming legislative session. If adopted, North Carolina could become a national test case for tying public higher education funding to workforce outcomes, with implications well beyond the Tar Heel State.
Cite This Page
"62% of NC employers struggle to hire—policy brief backs college workforce ties." HR & Workforce Intelligence Brief, August 11, 2026. https://gethrbrief.com/story/nc-workforce-policy-hr-skills-gap
How we covered this story
Every story in our hr & workforce coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.
Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the hr & workforce space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.
Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.
| Signal on this page | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Verified by N sources | Independent corroboration count. N≥2 is our confidence floor; N=1 is marked explicitly. |
| Impact score (1-10) | Regulatory + financial + operational weight. 8+ signals an experienced-operator action item. |
| Sentiment | Five-tier classification trained on labeled hr & workforce-specific corpora. |
| Timeline | Where applicable, the related-events sequence that contextualizes today's development. |