Talent Bearish 6

Only 22% of workers feel job-safe from AI—39K global survey reveals deep anxiety

The ADP Today at Work 2026 report shows widespread insecurity despite low unemployment. HR leaders must urgently address AI-related anxiety through transparent communication and reskilling programs.

· 3 min read ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • The ADP Today at Work 2026 report shows widespread insecurity despite low unemployment.
  • HR leaders must urgently address AI-related anxiety through transparent communication and reskilling programs.

Mentioned

ADP Research company Nela Richardson person Ipsos company Epoch AI company Fortune company Today at Work 2026 report product

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Only 22% of workers worldwide strongly agreed their job was safe from elimination, according to ADP Research’s survey of 39,000 workers across 36 countries.
  2. 2Half of American adults used AI in the past week, and 20% of full-time workers say AI has already taken over parts of their job, per an Ipsos/Epoch AI poll.
  3. 3The survey was conducted in late summer 2025 and released in July 2026 as the Today at Work 2026 report, amid historically low global unemployment.
  4. 4Nela Richardson, ADP chief economist, stated that despite low unemployment, “our data reveals widespread job insecurity expressed by workers worldwide.”
  5. 5Fortune magazine’s analysis describes a workforce “caught in the crosscurrents of technological disruption, demographic upheaval, and deep uncertainty.”

Despite three years of historically low global unemployment and steady economic growth, our data reveals widespread job insecurity expressed by workers worldwide.

Nela Richardson Chief Economist, ADP

Briefing on survey results in New York City

Global workers strongly agreeing job is safe
22%

From ADP Today at Work 2026 survey of 39K workers

Analysis

For HR professionals, the data is a wake-up call: while unemployment is historically low, employee anxiety about AI is at an all-time high. This isn’t just a morale issue; it’s a talent retention and productivity risk. The 22% figure underscores how few workers trust their companies to protect them from technological disruption. HR departments must lead the charge in bridging the gap between AI implementation and workforce readiness.

The global workforce is in the grip of a profound anxiety crisis driven by artificial intelligence, and corporations appear to be doing shockingly little to prepare their employees for the upheaval. That is the stark conclusion of ADP Research’s Today at Work 2026 report, one of the largest workforce sentiment surveys ever conducted, which polled over 39,000 workers across 36 countries. The headline number is sobering: just 22% of workers worldwide strongly agreed that their job is safe from elimination—a figure that underscores how deeply technological disruption has eroded confidence even as unemployment rates remain historically low.

That is the stark conclusion of ADP Research’s Today at Work 2026 report, one of the largest workforce sentiment surveys ever conducted, which polled over 39,000 workers across 36 countries.

This paradox—low unemployment paired with soaring job insecurity—lies at the heart of the report. Nela Richardson, ADP’s chief economist, noted during the survey briefing that “despite three years of historically low global unemployment and steady economic growth, our data reveals widespread job insecurity expressed by workers worldwide.” The anxiety is not speculative: a companion poll conducted by Ipsos in partnership with Epoch AI found that half of American adults used AI in the past week, and 20% of full-time workers say AI has already taken over parts of their job. In other words, the tsunami is not on the horizon—it is already crashing on the shore.

The implications for corporations are enormous. Worker anxiety about AI is no longer a fringe issue; it is a central business risk. When 78% of a global workforce does not strongly feel their job is safe, engagement, productivity, and retention are all at stake. Employees who fear for their future are less likely to invest in their current roles, less likely to trust their employers, and more likely to seek perceived shelter elsewhere. Yet the ADP data, along with the analysis in Fortune magazine by Nick Lichtenberg, paints a picture of a corporate world that has “failed to convince their workforce to welcome artificial intelligence with open arms.” The lack of transparent communication, reskilling programs, and genuine career-path planning leaves workers adrift in a sea of uncertainty.

What to Watch

The fear is not uniform; it reflects the unevenness of AI adoption. As the Ipsos data shows, AI is already altering the fabric of daily work for a significant minority. This creates a two-tier workforce: those who have already lost parts of their role to automation and those who dread it. Without intervention, this split can breed resentment, disengagement, and a toxic culture. The corporate failure is essentially a failure of leadership at the intersection of HR, technology, and strategy.

Looking forward, the report is a clarion call. Companies that proactively address the AI anxiety gap—by investing in upskilling, redesigning roles to complement AI rather than be replaced by it, and communicating honestly about the future—will not only retain talent but also unlock the full productivity promise of AI. Those that ignore it may find themselves with a demoralized workforce ill-equipped to compete in an AI-augmented economy. The survey data, collected in late summer 2025 and released in July 2026, suggests that the window for action is rapidly closing. As Richardson’s remarks indicate, even a period of global growth and low unemployment cannot insulate workers from the psychological impact of technological change. The ball is in the corporate court.

Sources

Sources

Based on 1 source article

Cite This Page

"Only 22% of workers feel job-safe from AI—39K global survey reveals deep anxiety." HR & Workforce Intelligence Brief, July 27, 2026. https://gethrbrief.com/story/hr-ai-tsunami-22-percent-job-security

How we covered this story

Every story in our hr & workforce coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the hr & workforce space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.