Market Trends Bearish 6

Centrica to cut 1,300 jobs as 90% of customers go digital

Centrica’s plan to eliminate 1,300 customer service roles over two years highlights how workforce composition is being reshaped by automation and digital self-service. The energy giant says 90% of customers now avoid phone contact, making large contact-centre teams redundant.

· 4 min read · Verified by 3 sources ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • Centrica’s plan to eliminate 1,300 customer service roles over two years highlights how workforce composition is being reshaped by automation and digital self-service.
  • The energy giant says 90% of customers now avoid phone contact, making large contact-centre teams redundant.

Mentioned

Centrica company British Gas company Chris O'Shea person

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 1Centrica plans to cut approximately 1,300 jobs over two years, including 500 announced last month and 800 additional reductions.
  2. 2The cuts will reduce the customer operations workforce by about 14%, reflecting a 20% year-on-year drop in average customer calls.
  3. 3Around 90% of customers now use digital support methods, accelerating a shift away from phone-based service.
  4. 4CEO Chris O’Shea says the company is still growing and creating jobs, but must reflect structural changes in customer behaviour.
  5. 5The UK government’s VAT cut on energy bills from 1 October will save a typical household £45 per year, a move O’Shea welcomed while advocating for more targeted support.
Total job cuts planned
1,300 +800 additional

Incremental announcement after initial 500 cuts in June 2026

Who's Affected

Centrica customer service staff
workforceNegative
Offshore outsourced support
workforceNegative
Digital & tech hiring
workforcePositive

Analysis

For HR
  • Natural attrition to absorb cuts reduces compulsory redundancy exposure
  • Opportunity to reskill agents for higher-value digital or green roles
  • Leaner workforce may improve per-employee productivity metrics
Risk factors
  • Loss of institutional customer knowledge in contact-centre teams
  • Potential surge in complex complaints if digital tools fail for vulnerable customers
  • Employee morale and employer brand damage from consecutive rounds of cuts

Analysis

For HR professionals, Centrica’s latest restructuring is a textbook case of digitisation’s downstream impact on headcount. With call volumes down 20% year-on-year and a 14% reduction in customer operations staff planned, the numbers illustrate how swiftly a stable workforce can be hollowed out by technology—raising urgent questions about retraining, attrition management, and the employee value proposition in traditionally high-churn roles.

Centrica, the parent company of British Gas, has announced plans to reduce its workforce by approximately 1,300 roles over the next two years, as part of a broader transformation of its customer service and support operations. The move comprises 500 cuts already announced last month and an additional 800 roles now being targeted, representing a 14% reduction in the company’s customer operations headcount. The company frames the actions as a response to a fundamental shift in how customers interact with energy providers, with average phone calls falling by 20% year-on-year and around 90% of customers now using digital channels for support.

The company frames the actions as a response to a fundamental shift in how customers interact with energy providers, with average phone calls falling by 20% year-on-year and around 90% of customers now using digital channels for support.

The cuts will fall heavily on contact-based roles, with around 500 positions in customer operations eliminated, plus additional reductions in offshore outsourced support. Group support functions will also be streamlined for greater efficiency. Notably, Centrica says it will use natural attrition—not replacing staff who leave or retire—to absorb a portion of the reductions, which softens the headline but still signals a significant downsizing of its traditional customer-facing workforce.

Chief Executive Chris O’Shea framed the overhaul not as retrenchment but as reallocation. He emphasized that the company is “creating an awful lot of jobs” and is growing, but must reflect changing customer behaviour. This aligns with Centrica’s multi-year transformation programme aimed at modernising operations and improving commercial performance. The scale of the digital shift is stark: a 20% drop in call volumes in just one year means a smaller, leaner support team can handle queries, provided digital self-service tools are effective.

From an operational perspective, the plan carries both risk and opportunity. Reducing human contact points might lower costs but could harm customer satisfaction if digital channels fail to resolve complex issues—especially for vulnerable customers who may still rely on phone support. Centrica appears to be betting that the trend is irreversible and that investing in automation and AI-driven chatbots will yield a sustainable competitive advantage. The 90% digital adoption rate cited by the company suggests the transition is already well-advanced, but the remaining 10% of customers—often elderly or digitally excluded—may find themselves underserved.

The job cuts come as the UK energy sector faces political pressure over high bills. The article also notes O’Shea’s welcome for the planned October 1 VAT cut on energy bills, which will save a typical household £45 a year, though he advocates for more targeted support in the long run. This context underscores that Centrica is operating in a delicate environment: it must show cost discipline to support margins while avoiding reputational backlash from public-facing layoffs.

For the wider industry, Centrica’s move may be a bellwether. Utility companies across Europe are digitising customer service, and similar headcount reductions are likely to follow as call volumes decline. The shift to smart meters, apps, and AI assistants is reducing the need for human intervention. However, this creates a societal challenge: the loss of relatively accessible, entry-level jobs in areas like contact centres, which could exacerbate regional employment disparities.

What to Watch

Financially, the cuts should improve Centrica’s cost-to-serve metrics, though the exact savings have not been disclosed. The company’s stock price may reflect investor confidence in the transformation, but the absence of union or political backlash so far suggests stakeholders see the move as inevitable. With energy retail margins razor-thin, any efficiency gain is welcome. The two-year timeline gives Centrica room to manage the transition while potentially retraining some staff for new roles in growth areas such as renewable energy services, electric vehicle charging, or energy management—sectors where the company is expanding.

Looking ahead, the success of this overhaul will depend on execution. If attrition absorbs the bulk of cuts, social pain could be minimised. But if the digital shift stalls or customer complaints rise, Centrica may face pressure to reverse course. The company’s promise to “give customers what they want” will be tested by how well its technology handles the 90% who have already moved online, while not abandoning the 10% who haven’t.

Sources

Sources

Based on 3 source articles

Cite This Page

"Centrica to cut 1,300 jobs as 90% of customers go digital." HR & Workforce Intelligence Brief, July 23, 2026. https://gethrbrief.com/story/centrica-1300-job-cuts-digital-shift

How we covered this story

Every story in our hr & workforce coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the hr & workforce space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.

Sources are only linked to a story once they clear our classification pipeline at a minimum 35 percent relevance threshold. According to that methodology, reviewed July 2026, this follows multi-source corroboration standards recommended by journalism research bodies such as the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

See something wrong in this story — a wrong fact, a broken source link, a misattributed entity? Report a data issue.