market-trends Neutral 5

80% of Australian workers can't unplug despite right-to-disconnect laws

· 4 min read · Verified by 2 sources ·
Share

Key Takeaways

  • A new survey shows 80% of Australian employees fail to disconnect on holidays, with 75% returning more exhausted.
  • HR leaders face pressure to enforce boundaries as nearly a third feel compelled to check in.

Mentioned

Insure&Go company Aaron Jarden person Edith Cowan University company Madhvi Mishra person

Key Intelligence

Key Facts

  1. 180% of Australians report being unable to switch off from work, social media, or news while on holiday, according to a survey by travel insurer Insure&Go.
  2. 275% of Australians say they return from holidays more exhausted than when they left, undermining the restorative purpose of time off.
  3. 3Fewer than one in five Australians (less than 20%) fully disconnect from digital life while travelling.
  4. 4Nearly one-third (approximately 33%) feel pressured to check in with work during holidays, despite Victoria’s right-to-disconnect laws.
  5. 5Experts note a growing trend toward digital detox holidays as a market response to constant connectivity stress.

If nearly a third of Australians feel pressured to check in with work while on holiday, it undermines the very purpose of taking a break.

Madhvi Mishra Spokesperson, Insure&Go

Commenting on survey findings

Australian Workers Unable to Unplug
80% New survey

Insure&Go survey reveals majority bring work anxiety on holidays

Analysis

For HR professionals, the Insure&Go data is a flashing red alert: the right to disconnect may be on the books, but workplace culture still tethers employees to their phones. With 80% of staff unable to unplug and three-quarters coming back from leave drained, the very concept of 'restorative time off' is collapsing—right at the moment when burnout is a board-level issue.

A new survey from travel insurer Insure&Go has revealed a profound disconnect in how Australians take holidays: 80% admit they are unable to switch off from work, social media, or daily news while travelling, while 75% return from leave more exhausted than when they departed. The findings, released on June 25, 2026, paint a picture of a workforce and society chronically tethered to digital devices, undermining the restorative purpose of time off. Aaron Jarden, professor of wellbeing science at Edith Cowan University, described a collective longing for a slower pace of life that is being thwarted by the very tools that promise convenience. “Things are moving at such a pace that we’re not used to, and we’re struggling and getting stressed because of it,” Jarden told Explore. His commentary suggests that holidays have morphed into an extension of daily life rather than an escape from it, with smartphones simultaneously serving as holiday tools (navigation, currency conversion, communication) and relentless work tethers.

With 80% of staff unable to unplug and three-quarters coming back from leave drained, the very concept of 'restorative time off' is collapsing—right at the moment when burnout is a board-level issue.

The survey highlights that fewer than one in five Australians fully disconnect on holiday, leaving a vast majority plugged into the digital grind. This constant connectivity is exacting a toll on mental and physical health. Insure&Go spokesperson Madhvi Mishra pointed to Victoria’s right-to-disconnect laws as evidence that legislation has a role but noted its limits: “If nearly a third of Australians feel pressured to check in with work while on holiday, it undermines the very purpose of taking a break.” That figure—nearly one-third checking in with work—underscores the cultural and systemic forces at play. Employers may not be explicitly demanding attention, yet a culture of availability persists, reinforced by smartphone-enabled expectations.

The implications ripple across multiple sectors. For employers and HR leaders, the data signals a looming burnout crisis: if three-quarters of staff return from leave more fatigued than before, the productivity gains from holiday time are lost, potentially increasing turnover and healthcare costs. The travel and tourism industry faces a paradox: people are taking holidays, but the benefit—a refreshed, happy customer—is not materializing, which could dampen repeat leisure travel and the experiential premium that many operators rely on. Meanwhile, the growing interest in “digital detox” holidays represents a market response, with travel companies now promoting tech-free retreats as a differentiator.

What to Watch

Jarden’s historical contrast is telling: twenty years ago, holidays meant a genuine slowdown. Today, the mere presence of a smartphone, even if not used for work, keeps individuals in a state of fragmented attention, checking feeds, news, and notifications. The Insure&Go data offers a stark quantification of this cultural shift, suggesting that the ability to disconnect has become a marker of privilege or extreme discipline. The persistence of the problem, despite awareness campaigns and workplace policies, indicates that individual willpower is insufficient; systemic changes—from app design to employer expectation-setting—are required.

Looking forward, the findings may accelerate policy discussions around the right to disconnect not just in Victoria but nationwide, and potentially influence enterprise-level wellbeing programs. Travel insurers themselves, like Insure&Go, have a stake in reframing holidays as a time for genuine restoration, possibly linking premium discounts to evidence of digital detox. For the health sector, the survey provides population-level evidence of technology-driven stress, adding weight to calls for digital wellness to be integrated into public health guidelines. As hybrid and remote work blur boundaries further, the ability to truly switch off on holiday may become a key indicator of future employee wellbeing and societal resilience.

Sources

Sources

Based on 2 source articles

How we covered this story

Every story in our hr & workforce coverage is assembled from multiple primary sources, cross-referenced for factual consistency, and scored along three independent dimensions: sentiment, operational impact, and source-cluster confidence. Single-source rumors and unverifiable claims do not pass our editorial gate. When a story shows "Verified by N sources" with N≥2, the development is independently corroborated; when N=1, we mark it explicitly so readers can weigh the signal accordingly.

Impact scoring uses a 1-10 scale weighted toward regulatory, financial, and operational consequence rather than coverage volume. A topic that runs in every outlet but moves no real decisions ranks lower than a niche regulatory filing that reshapes how operators in the hr & workforce space have to behave. Read our full methodology for the scoring rubric, our glossary for term definitions, and our trends index for the longitudinal view across the beat.